Why Is the Surface So Bad?

The new Microsoft Surface tablet on display following a press conference at Pier 57 to officially launch Windows 8 and the tablet in New York Oct. 25, 2012.

Photo by Timothy A. Clary/AFP/Getty Images.

There?s only question anyone should ask about Microsoft?s Surface tablet: Is it better than the iPad?

I?ve spent the past week and a half trying to answer that question. During that time period, the Surface was my exclusive tablet?the only time I touched an iPad was to examine points of difference to write this review, and to use one or two iOS-only apps that I couldn?t give up. (By which I mean, I played Letterpress.)

But it didn?t take me a week and a half to decide whether the Surface is better than the iPad. At most it took a couple days, and that?s being generous. You?d likely arrive at the same conclusion after playing with the Surface for just a few minutes in a Microsoft Store. That?s because the new tablet?s flaws are glaring: It?s too slow, it?s mercilessly buggy, and the add-on that?s supposed to set it apart from the iPad?its touch-cover keyboard and trackpad?is nice but far from revolutionary. At $499 for the base model, plus $120 for the almost-required touch cover, the Surface is also not very competitive on price: You can get the newest standard iPad for the same $499, the still pretty good iPad 2 for $399, and the new iPad Mini for $329.

The Surface?s shortcomings are puzzling. Microsoft has been working on the technology in this device for years. When it decided to create its own hardware, it had to have known that making a good first impression against the iPad would be the key to the Surface?s long-term survival. The Surface is also the most celebrated home for Windows 8, the touch-friendly operating system that Microsoft is hoping will become a big hit on tablet machines. In other words, a lot?for Microsoft, perhaps everything?is riding on the Surface. So as I used it, I was nagged by a recurring question: Why is the Surface so bad?

The first problem is speed. Everything you do on the Surface takes more time than you expect. When you load an app, switch between apps, launch a Web page, go back to a previous Web page, check your email, and do pretty much anything else, you?ll find yourself waiting a half-second too long. This sounds like nothing, but when you compound that time time across every action on the Surface, the wasted half-seconds add up to an annoying trudge.

It?s not just the extra time that kills, but also how the tablet clues you in to its slowness. The surface is littered with little visual bugs that make you think the thing?s broken. When you pinch-to-zoom in on a Web page, the text first shows up looking jagged and low-res; after a small wait, it gets sharp. Every single time you go back in the browser, you?ll see the previous page grayed out; it takes a split second for it to light up.

When you switch the Surface from portrait to landscape mode, its interface doesn?t switch immediately. There?s a half-second where nothing happens, enough time to make you wonder if the switch registered the orientation switch, so you begin to turn it back the other way just as the screen flips to the new orientation. And when the screen does eventually flip, it?s not as smooth as the iPad. Instead the Surface?s screen simply quick-cuts from landscape to portrait and back again, and while that gets the job done, the transition feels less than elegant. And then there were the times I found myself tapping the Surface like a madman, because I couldn?t tell whether it was just responding slowly or whether it hadn?t even noticed me. This happened often. It wasn?t pleasant.

This suggests the first answer to why the Surface is so bad: Perhaps it?s just hobbled with an inadequate processor and too little RAM. Maybe we can expect future versions to pack more power and, consequently, to feel less frustrating. After all, Apple?s original tablet was a bit lethargic, too. But the iPad 2 was substantially faster and more enjoyable, and the third- and fourth-generation devices began to make good on the promise of ushering in a ?post-PC? era. So if it took Apple a couple tries to perfect the tablet, shouldn?t we cut Microsoft some slack, too?

No, we shouldn?t. The first iPad was released in 2010. It may not have been perfect, but it was unquestionably the best tablet of its era. The Surface is hitting the shelves in 2012, when, in addition to Apple?s tablets, you can now get Google?s Nexus 7 and Nexus 10 or one of Amazon?s super-cheap Kindle Fires. Because it was first to market, Apple?s first-generation device had some leeway to miss the mark, but its competitors have little room for error. Anyone who?s considering this tablet will be forced to stack it against the competition, and the Surface doesn?t wear these comparisons well.

Not even the first impression is great: I like the Surface?s sturdy design, and its built-in kickstand is handy, but when I picked it up, my first thought was, Boy, that?s heavy! When I looked up the specs, I discovered that the Surface is only about 20 grams heavier than the iPad 3, but somehow those grams make a difference. (My wife and my sister also remarked on the Surface?s weight when they first picked it up.) I also found that, despite Microsoft?s assertions, the Surface?s display isn?t as sharp as the high-definition iPad?s. When you compare text side by side, the iPad stands out as much more pleasant to read.

Source: http://feeds.slate.com/click.phdo?i=3f48457d1ce0d48f5f2c714d729e09bf

maurice jones drew Yash Chopra George McGovern green bay packers meteor shower bruno mars braxton miller